Biological Control of Weeds in Great Plains Rangelands
نویسندگان
چکیده
Chemical control ofweeds has increased agricultural productivity, but complete reliance on chemicals has serious drawbacks. These include high cost per acre, decreasing effectiveness, negative effects on plant community diversity, and increased opportunities for environmental contamination. One alternative is biocontrol, the use ofbiologicalfactors that naturally limit weed populations. Long-term research goals focus on improving our knowledge of the processes that control and limit potential plant pests naturally and to use that knowledge to develop predictable, sustainable, low-cost, biologicallybased weed management strategies. This paper reviews the ecological underpinnings ofclassical biological control ofweeds, including basic research on the interaction ofnatural enemies with native thistles in Nebraska. Thefundamentalsfor developing a biological weed controlprogram are summarized and research in the central and northern Great Plains on applying biological controls to limit introduced noxious rangeland weeds is reviewed. This is followed by a discussion of one of the problems associated with biological control, the potential secondary effects of biocontrol agents on non-target plant species. The evidence suggests that biological control is an ecologicallysound, sustainable and economical option for limiting introduced rangeland weeds. Biological control represents an attractive technique for limiting the negative impacts ofhigh weed densities, while not eradicating the introduced weed. Expanding interest in sustainable agricultural systems and more environmentally-friendlypest control and the prohibitive costs ofchemical control suggest that biological weed control is likely to become an increasingly important part ofrangeland management.
منابع مشابه
Integrated Restoration Strategies Towards Weed Control On Western Rangelands
Although cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) has been widely distributed across western rangelands for >70 years, the full ecologic and economic impacts of this non-native invasive plant have not yet occurred. Unfortunately, several independent lines of evidence indicate that the rate at which acreage becomes infested with cheatgrass is increasing rapidly. Furthermore, the invasion and spread of a num...
متن کاملViewpoint: Forage and Range Research Needs in the Central Great Plains
In the central Great Plains, pastures and rangelands often are not economically competitive with grain crops. This has led to increases in acreages of row crops at the expense of rangelands, pastures, and hay crops on marginal lands resulting in severe erosion problems. The productivity of forages, pastures, and rangelands needs to be increased to levels that would make them economically compet...
متن کاملManagement Implications of Global Change for Great Plains Rangelands
The Great Plains of North America encompass approximately 85 million ha (210 million acres) consisting of shortgrass, mixed-grass, and tallgrass prairie with about 60% of this area converted to crop agriculture and the remainder used primarily for livestock production. Large-scale gradients of precipitation (west to east, <30 to >100 cm; <12 to >40 inches) and mean annual temperature (north to ...
متن کاملA Multi-Tactic Approach to Manage Weed Population Dynamics in Crop Rotations
L.) are now grown with winter wheat and fallow. Integrating crop diversity with other cultural tactics enabled No-till systems have enabled producers to change crop rotations in producers to effectively control weeds with 50% less the semiarid Central Great Plains. Previously, winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–fallow was the prevalent rotation; now producers grow herbicide inputs compared wit...
متن کامل